Author Posts

05/12/2015 at 7:25 AM

Ofcom consultation

Ofcom have published a consultation on proposed changes to is “Persistent Misuse” policy: Review of how we use our powers: Focus on silent and abandoned calls which closes 10 February 2016.  A link to the Ofcom consultation web page and how to respond is available here and there is an online form for responses. 

How to respond to the Ofcom consultation

There are three ways to respond to an Ofcom consultation.

1) Online
The quickest and simplest way is to complete our online consultation response form. This is ideal for people who have specific brief points to make and/or do not need to attach large documents to their response.

2) By email
For larger consultation responses – particularly those with supporting charts, tables or other data – please email attaching your response in Microsoft Word format, together with a consultation coversheet.

3) By post
Alternatively, you can write to Ofcom. Please address your response to Kiera Bower, Ofcom, Riverside House, 2A Southwark Bridge Road, London SE1 9HA. Please enclose a consultation coversheet with your response.

07/01/2016 at 9:57 AM

Included in the consultation is a draft revised policy, which would replace the current one. It is, hovwever, important to also look at the other documents, including the annexes.

This is because one major change with this revision is that Ofcom has spent a lot of time and effort trying to obtain information about the overall calling environment and the commercial and consumer effects of any changes. These have come from the 2014 call for inputs, and the subsequent surveys along with economic calculations.

As a result Ofcom are quoting specific facts and figures rather than just pulling numbers out of the air. Any responses to the consultation will need to address the underlying evidence as well as the policies themselves.

A quick summary of changes that I think will be of interest:

– There are more explicit statements of what constitutes misuse although, as before, the door is left open for things that aren’t specifically mentioned to be defined as misuse if necessary

– One specific statement is “Calling parties should not make silent of abandoned calls”

– Things that may be considered misuse:

– For IVM:

——- Long waits while being passed to an agent

——- Not providing information on who is calling while the person is waiting for an agent

– Rotating CLIs

– It is explicitly stated that 3 silent or abandoned calls may be considered to be misuse

– When considering what action to take the Abandoned Call Rate (ACR) on non-infringing days will be taken into account

– Currently only days over 3% are considered. The implication is that in future all abandoned calls will be taken into account. I take this to mean that if you’re caught over 3% then if you’ve been running at 2.95% most of the time you’re likely to incur a larger fine than if you’d been running at 1%

– Management practices and processes will be taken into account

– Has testing been done?

– Are staff competent?

– Are you actively monitoring third parties that call on your behalf?

Overall the aim appears to be to push down the number of silent and abandoned calls while making it easier for Ofcom to take action.

I would encourage everyone to read and respond. As I said at last year’s user group meeting these reviews don’t happen very often and the only way the industry has a voice is to make their feeling known during the consultation period. I am sure consumers and consumer groups will be responding, without industry input there will be no balance.



  • This reply was modified 2 years, 10 months ago by  Dave Nicholls.